Symbian Ltd v Christensen [2000] EWCA Civ 517 (24 May 2000)
Clause 4.3 of the employment contract remains enforceable during the garden leave period, and an injunction restraining Mr Christensen from working for Microsoft until expiry of the notice period is justified to protect Symbian's legitimate interests and does not constitute an unreasonable restraint of trade. The Vice-Chancellor properly exercised judicial discretion in granting the injunction.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 517
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Symbian Limited; Defendant/appellant: Juha Christen Christensen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Chancery Division (interlocutory Injunction) / Application for Permission to Appeal And, If Granted, Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Garden Leave, Restraint of Trade, Injunctions, Employment Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Symbian Limited
Claimant/respondent
Juha Christen Christensen
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Chancery Division (interlocutory Injunction) / Application for Permission to Appeal And, If Granted, Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 4.3 of the employment contract can be enforced by injunction during a garden leave period to restrain the employee from working for a competitor
- 2 Whether enforcement of clause 4.3 constitutes an unreasonable restraint of trade
- 3 Whether the court should limit the injunction to the scope of clause 15.4.6
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 4.3 of the employment contract remains enforceable during the garden leave period, and an injunction restraining Mr Christensen from working for Microsoft until expiry of the notice period is justified to protect Symbian's legitimate interests and does not constitute an unreasonable restraint of trade. The Vice-Chancellor properly exercised judicial discretion in granting the injunction.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
- Injunction granted by the Vice-Chancellor remains in force
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment