Richard Baker Harrison Ltd v Brooks & Ors [2021] EWHC 2562 (QB) (24 September 2021)

Richard Baker Harrison Ltd v Brooks & Ors [2021] EWHC 2562 (QB) (24 September 2021)

The defendants breached contractual and equitable obligations by establishing a competing business, soliciting suppliers, misusing confidential information, and causing termination of a key supplier contract while still employed. The restrictive covenants are reasonable and enforceable to protect RBH's legitimate business interests. Brooks owed and breached fiduciary duties regarding supplier relationships.

Citation
[2021] EWHC 2562
Parties
Claimant: Richard Baker Harrison Limited; First Defendant: Mark Brooks; Second Defendant: Andrew Sambrook; Third Defendant: BS Sourcing Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 September 2021
Procedural Posture
Expedited Trial (high Court, Queen's Bench Division) / Liability and Enforceability of Post Termination Restrictions Determined
Outcome
Claim succeeded as to liability and enforceability of post-termination restrictions.
Legal Topics
Restrictive Covenants, Confidential Information, Fiduciary Duties, Employee Competition, Post Termination Restraints
Employment Law Contract Law Equity Restrictive Covenants Confidential Information Fiduciary Duties Employee Competition Post Termination Restraints

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Baker Harrison Limited

Claimant

Mark Brooks

First Defendant

Andrew Sambrook

Second Defendant

BS Sourcing Limited

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Expedited Trial (high Court, Queen's Bench Division) / Liability and Enforceability of Post Termination Restrictions Determined

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether defendants breached contractual and equitable obligations of confidentiality and non-competition
  2. 2 Whether restrictive covenants are enforceable
  3. 3 Whether defendants misused confidential information

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants breached contractual and equitable obligations by establishing a competing business, soliciting suppliers, misusing confidential information, and causing termination of a key supplier contract while still employed. The restrictive covenants are reasonable and enforceable to protect RBH's legitimate business interests. Brooks owed and breached fiduciary duties regarding supplier relationships.

Court Disposition

Claim succeeded as to liability and enforceability of post-termination restrictions.

Orders

  • Defendants restrained from using or disclosing RBH's confidential information
  • Defendants restrained from breaching post-termination restraints relating to RBH's customers, prospective customers, and suppliers