Knight v Gibson
The trial judge did not misdirect herself or err in principle in refusing an inquiry and instead fixing damages based on the limited evidence available, given the disproportionate cost and delay further proceedings would entail. The exercise of discretion was consistent with the overriding objective and proportionality.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: David Whitburn Knight; Defendant/respondent: Brian Halley Gibson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Quantum of Damages for Breach of Covenant
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Damages Assessment, Discretion of Trial Judge, Case Management, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Whitburn Knight
Claimant/appellant
Brian Halley Gibson
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Quantum of Damages for Breach of Covenant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing an inquiry as to damages and instead fixing damages herself for breach of covenant
- 2 Whether the judge misdirected herself in the exercise of discretion regarding quantum of damages
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge did not misdirect herself or err in principle in refusing an inquiry and instead fixing damages based on the limited evidence available, given the disproportionate cost and delay further proceedings would entail. The exercise of discretion was consistent with the overriding objective and proportionality.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Damages fixed at £4,000 for breach of covenant over eight years (£500 per year) stand
- No inquiry as to damages ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment