Prophet Plc v Huggett
The restrictive covenant, as drafted, unambiguously referred only to products (Pr2 and Pr3) with which Mr Huggett was involved at Prophet. Since no competitor provides those products, the clause did not bar Mr Huggett from working for K3. The court cannot re-write or add words to the clause to give it commercial effect; Prophet must accept the bargain it made.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Prophet PLC; Defendant/appellant: Christopher Huggett
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Interpretation of Contracts, Restraint of Trade
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prophet PLC
Claimant/respondent
Christopher Huggett
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper interpretation of a restrictive covenant in an employment contract
- 2 Whether the restrictive covenant was enforceable or void for being in unreasonable restraint of trade
- 3 Whether the court can correct or re-write a restrictive covenant to give it commercial effect
Ratio Decidendi
The restrictive covenant, as drafted, unambiguously referred only to products (Pr2 and Pr3) with which Mr Huggett was involved at Prophet. Since no competitor provides those products, the clause did not bar Mr Huggett from working for K3. The court cannot re-write or add words to the clause to give it commercial effect; Prophet must accept the bargain it made.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Paragraph 1 of the judge’s order set aside
- Injunction against Mr Huggett discharged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment