International Sports Tours Ltd (t/a Inspire Sports) v Shorey & Ors
Summary judgment is granted on admitted breaches of restrictive covenants and misuse of confidential information. The Defendant is found in contempt of court for knowingly swearing a false affidavit, but due to early admission, mitigation, and limited prejudice, a fine rather than a custodial sentence is imposed. The committal application is valid as it is based solely on affidavit evidence and does not require permission.
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: International Sports Tours Limited T/A Inspire Sports; 1st Defendant/respondent: Mr Thomas Shorey; 2nd Defendant: Equity Inspiring Learning Limited; 3rd Defendant: Sport Academies Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contract/confidential Information/contempt) / Summary Judgment and Committal Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in part; Defendant found in contempt; fine imposed; costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Confidential Information, Summary Judgment, Committal for Contempt, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
International Sports Tours Limited T/A Inspire Sports
Claimant/applicant
Mr Thomas Shorey
1st Defendant/respondent
Equity Inspiring Learning Limited
2nd Defendant
Sport Academies Limited
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (contract/confidential Information/contempt) / Summary Judgment and Committal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant breached restrictive covenants and misused confidential information
- 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted on admitted breaches
- 3 Whether the Defendant is in contempt of court for knowingly swearing a false affidavit
Ratio Decidendi
Summary judgment is granted on admitted breaches of restrictive covenants and misuse of confidential information. The Defendant is found in contempt of court for knowingly swearing a false affidavit, but due to early admission, mitigation, and limited prejudice, a fine rather than a custodial sentence is imposed. The committal application is valid as it is based solely on affidavit evidence and does not require permission.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in part; Defendant found in contempt; fine imposed; costs orders made.
Orders
- Summary judgment for Claimant on admitted breaches; remaining issues to proceed to trial.
- Defendant fined £1,000 for contempt, payable within 28 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment