Houst Ltd, Re [2022] EWHC 1765 (Ch) (14 June 2022)
The statutory requirements for convening meetings under section 901C Companies Act 2006 are satisfied, including jurisdiction, financial difficulty, appropriate class composition, and adequate notice. The court orders the convening of the proposed meetings to consider the restructuring plan.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1765 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant Company: Houst Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Company Restructuring Application / Application for Convening Meetings Under Section 901 C Companies Act 2006
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Restructuring Plan, Creditors' Meetings, Section 901 C Companies Act 2006, Class Composition, Pre Pack Administration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Houst Limited
Applicant Company
Procedural Posture
Company Restructuring Application / Application for Convening Meetings Under Section 901 C Companies Act 2006
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the jurisdictional requirements for a restructuring plan under section 901A Companies Act 2006 are satisfied
- 2 Whether the proposed class composition for creditor and member meetings is appropriate
- 3 Whether adequate notice and information has been given to affected parties
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory requirements for convening meetings under section 901C Companies Act 2006 are satisfied, including jurisdiction, financial difficulty, appropriate class composition, and adequate notice. The court orders the convening of the proposed meetings to consider the restructuring plan.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Order convening five meetings of creditors and one meeting of members to consider the proposed restructuring plan.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment