Waldorf Production UK PLC, In the Matter Of [2025] EWHC 2297 (Ch) (09 September 2025)
The judge granted a leapfrog certificate under section 12(3)(b) of the Administration of Justice Act 1969, finding that the issue of the correct legal test for fairness in cross-class cramdown is a point of law of general public importance, that he was bound by recent Court of Appeal authority, and that there is a sufficiently arguable case for the Supreme Court to consider overturning or qualifying those authorities. The judge declined to grant permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal, finding no sufficient basis for an appeal on the facts or exercise of discretion.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 2297 (Ch)
- Parties
- Plan Company: Waldorf Production UK PLC; Supporting Creditor Group: SteerCo; Opposing Creditor Group: Capricorn Companies; Opposing Creditor: His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leapfrog Certificate and Permission to Appeal / Post Judgment, Consequential Hearing Following Refusal to Sanction Restructuring Plan
- Outcome
- Leapfrog certificate granted; permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal refused; no further order as to costs after 21 August 2025.
- Legal Topics
- Restructuring Plan, Cross Class Cramdown, Leapfrog Appeal, Fairness Test, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Waldorf Production UK PLC
Plan Company
SteerCo
Supporting Creditor Group
Capricorn Companies
Opposing Creditor Group
His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC)
Opposing Creditor
Procedural Posture
Application for Leapfrog Certificate and Permission to Appeal / Post Judgment, Consequential Hearing Following Refusal to Sanction Restructuring Plan
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a leapfrog certificate under section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1969 to permit direct appeal to the Supreme Court regarding the fairness test in cross-class cramdown under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006
- 2 Whether to grant permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal as an alternative
- 3 How costs should be allocated post-judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The judge granted a leapfrog certificate under section 12(3)(b) of the Administration of Justice Act 1969, finding that the issue of the correct legal test for fairness in cross-class cramdown is a point of law of general public importance, that he was bound by recent Court of Appeal authority, and that there is a sufficiently arguable case for the Supreme Court to consider overturning or qualifying those authorities. The judge declined to grant permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal, finding no sufficient basis for an appeal on the facts or exercise of discretion.
Court Disposition
Leapfrog certificate granted; permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal refused; no further order as to costs after 21 August 2025.
Orders
- Leapfrog certificate under section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1969 granted to the Plan Company.
- Permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment