Thames Water Utilities Holdings, Re
The court granted the Plan Company's application to convene seven class meetings of Plan Creditors, holding that the proposed classes are properly constituted based on differences in rights under the debt waterfall and make-whole provisions, that all statutory and procedural requirements for notice and jurisdiction are satisfied, and that no jurisdictional or procedural obstacles exist to convening the meetings. The court found that the statutory conditions for a Part 26A restructuring plan are met and that the differences in rights among creditors do not require further fracturing of classes beyond those proposed.
- Parties
- Applicant Plan Company: Thames Water Utilities Holdings Ltd; Class a Creditors: Group of Class A Plan Creditors; Class B Creditors: Group of Class B Plan Creditors; Creditors: Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets and BNP Paribas; Creditors/group Companies: Thames Water Limited and certain creditors of Kemble Water Finance Limited and Thames Water (Kemble) Finance Plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Restructuring Plan Application (companies Act 2006, Part 26 A) / Convening Hearing for Directions and Class Constitution
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Restructuring Plan, Class Constitution, Cross Class Cram Down, Jurisdiction Under Companies Act 2006 Part 26 a, Scheme of Arrangement, Creditor Rights, Debt Waterfall, Administration Comparator
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thames Water Utilities Holdings Ltd
Applicant Plan Company
Group of Class A Plan Creditors
Class a Creditors
Group of Class B Plan Creditors
Class B Creditors
Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets and BNP Paribas
Creditors
Thames Water Limited and certain creditors of Kemble Water Finance Limited and Thames Water (Kemble) Finance Plc
Creditors/group Companies
Procedural Posture
Restructuring Plan Application (companies Act 2006, Part 26 A) / Convening Hearing for Directions and Class Constitution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant directions to convene meetings of Plan Creditors to consider a restructuring plan under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006
- 2 Whether the proposed creditor classes are properly constituted for the purposes of the Plan
- 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to sanction the Plan at the sanction hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted the Plan Company's application to convene seven class meetings of Plan Creditors, holding that the proposed classes are properly constituted based on differences in rights under the debt waterfall and make-whole provisions, that all statutory and procedural requirements for notice and jurisdiction are satisfied, and that no jurisdictional or procedural obstacles exist to convening the meetings. The court found that the statutory conditions for a Part 26A restructuring plan are met and that the differences in rights among creditors do not require further fracturing of classes beyond those proposed.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Directions given for convening seven class meetings of Plan Creditors to consider the proposed restructuring plan under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006
- Approval of class constitution as proposed by the Plan Company
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment