Listrac Midco Ltd & Ors, Re (Re Part 26A Companies Act 2006) [2023] EWHC 460 (Ch) (03 March 2023)
The statutory requirements for sanctioning the restructuring plans under Part 26A Companies Act 2006 are satisfied for all seven Plan Companies. For those companies where not all creditor classes approved, the cross-class cram down mechanism under s.901G is engaged, as the dissenting classes are not worse off than in the relevant alternative and the plans were approved by a class with a genuine economic interest. The plans are fair, reasonable, and represent a fair distribution of restructuring benefits. There is no defect or blot, and no active opposition. Accordingly, the court sanctions the plans for all seven companies.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 460 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant Company: Listrac Midco Limited; Applicant Company: Listrac Bidco Limited; Applicant Company: Lifeways Finance Limited; Applicant Company: Lifeways Community Care Limited; Applicant Company: Living Ambitions Limited; Applicant Company: Autism Care (UK) Limited; Applicant Company: Vitavia Property Management Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Sanction of Restructuring Plans Under Part 26 a Companies Act 2006 / Sanction Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Plans sanctioned for all seven Plan Companies.
- Legal Topics
- Restructuring Plans, Cross Class Cram Down, Creditors' Meetings, Sanction of Schemes, Companies Act 2006 Part 26 a
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Listrac Midco Limited
Applicant Company
Listrac Bidco Limited
Applicant Company
Lifeways Finance Limited
Applicant Company
Lifeways Community Care Limited
Applicant Company
Living Ambitions Limited
Applicant Company
Autism Care (UK) Limited
Applicant Company
Vitavia Property Management Limited
Applicant Company
Procedural Posture
Application for Sanction of Restructuring Plans Under Part 26 a Companies Act 2006 / Sanction Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory requirements for sanctioning restructuring plans under Part 26A Companies Act 2006 are met
- 2 Whether cross-class cram down under s.901G CA 2006 is available and appropriate
- 3 Whether the plans are fair and reasonable and represent a fair distribution of restructuring benefits
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory requirements for sanctioning the restructuring plans under Part 26A Companies Act 2006 are satisfied for all seven Plan Companies. For those companies where not all creditor classes approved, the cross-class cram down mechanism under s.901G is engaged, as the dissenting classes are not worse off than in the relevant alternative and the plans were approved by a class with a genuine economic interest. The plans are fair, reasonable, and represent a fair distribution of restructuring benefits. There is no defect or blot, and no active opposition. Accordingly, the court sanctions the plans for all seven companies.
Court Disposition
Plans sanctioned for all seven Plan Companies.
Orders
- Order sanctioning the restructuring plans for Listrac Midco Limited, Listrac Bidco Limited, Lifeways Finance Limited, Lifeways Community Care Limited, Living Ambitions Limited, Autism Care (UK) Limited, and Vitavia Property Management Limited under Part 26A Companies Act 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment