UK Commercial Property Finance Holdings Ltd v Cine-UK Ltd & Anor [2024] EWHC 2475 (Ch) (30 September 2024)
The court sanctioned the restructuring plans, including the cross-class cram down of dissenting creditor classes, holding that the statutory conditions under sections 901F and 901G Companies Act 2006 were satisfied. The relevant alternative was insolvent administration, in which dissenting creditors would be no better off. The negative covenants in the side letters, while enforceable in principle, could be compromised by the restructuring plan under the statutory jurisdiction. The plans were fair, necessary, and represented a proper exercise of the court's discretion. The applications for injunctions by the Objectors were refused.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 2475 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/objecting Creditor: UK Commercial Property Finance Holdings Limited; Claimant/objecting Creditor: The Crown Estate Commissioners; Defendant/plan Company: Cine-UK Limited; Defendant/plan Company: Cineworld Estates Limited; Plan Company: Cineworld Cinemas Limited; Plan Company: Cineworld Cinema Properties Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Restructuring Plan Sanction and Injunction Applications / Sanction Hearing and Determination of Injunction Applications
- Outcome
- Restructuring plans sanctioned; applications for injunctions refused.
- Legal Topics
- Restructuring Plans, Cross Class Cram Down, Lease Liabilities, Negative Covenants, Injunctions, Sanction of Restructuring Plan
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UK Commercial Property Finance Holdings Limited
Claimant/objecting Creditor
The Crown Estate Commissioners
Claimant/objecting Creditor
Cine-UK Limited
Defendant/plan Company
Cineworld Estates Limited
Defendant/plan Company
Cineworld Cinemas Limited
Plan Company
Cineworld Cinema Properties Limited
Plan Company
Procedural Posture
Restructuring Plan Sanction and Injunction Applications / Sanction Hearing and Determination of Injunction Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should sanction the restructuring plans under sections 901F and 901G of the Companies Act 2006, including cross-class cram down of dissenting creditor classes
- 2 Whether the inclusion of certain leases in the plans breaches negative covenants in side letters and whether injunctions should be granted to exclude those leases from the plans
Ratio Decidendi
The court sanctioned the restructuring plans, including the cross-class cram down of dissenting creditor classes, holding that the statutory conditions under sections 901F and 901G Companies Act 2006 were satisfied. The relevant alternative was insolvent administration, in which dissenting creditors would be no better off. The negative covenants in the side letters, while enforceable in principle, could be compromised by the restructuring plan under the statutory jurisdiction. The plans were fair, necessary, and represented a proper exercise of the court's discretion. The applications for injunctions by the Objectors were refused.
Court Disposition
Restructuring plans sanctioned; applications for injunctions refused.
Orders
- Sanction of the restructuring plans for Cine-UK Limited, Cineworld Cinemas Limited, Cineworld Cinema Properties Limited, and Cineworld Estates Limited under sections 901F and 901G Companies Act 2006.
- Refusal of injunctions sought by UK Commercial Property Finance Holdings Limited and The Crown Estate Commissioners to exclude their leases from the plans.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment