Day v Day
The claimant succeeded in her claim as the defendant was ordered to pay her a substantial sum; the trial judge erred in characterising the outcome as a draw and in his approach to costs. The general rule that costs follow the event should apply, and the claimant is entitled to all her costs.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Lilian Day; Defendant/respondent: Phillip Day
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Chancery Division to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Resulting Trusts, Constructive Trusts, Beneficial Ownership, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lilian Day
Claimant/appellant
Phillip Day
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Chancery Division to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the property was held on a common intention constructive trust for the claimant for life with remainder to John, or on a resulting trust for Elsie and John in shares of 60:40
- 2 Whether the sum contributed by John was a gift to Elsie
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in the exercise of discretion on costs
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant succeeded in her claim as the defendant was ordered to pay her a substantial sum; the trial judge erred in characterising the outcome as a draw and in his approach to costs. The general rule that costs follow the event should apply, and the claimant is entitled to all her costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appellant to have her costs of the hearing below assessed if not agreed
- Order of the Deputy Judge on costs set aside and substituted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment