Knowlden v Tehrani & Ors
Mr Knowlden is entitled to beneficial ownership of 43 Graham Terrace as he was induced to transfer property into Triumph Trading by Ms Tehrani’s fraudulent representations. The trust deed is not binding due to fraud. He is not entitled to a beneficial interest in Cae Haidd Bach as the purported sale was a sham and no purchase money resulting trust arises. The doctrine of illegality does not bar Mr Knowlden’s claim as he does not need to rely on any unlawful conduct to establish his property rights.
- Parties
- Claimant: Richard Paul Knowlden; First Defendant: Simin Nafis Tehrani; Second Defendant: Stephen Puleston Williams; Third Defendant: Triumph Trading Company Limited; Fourth Defendant: Bobbetts Mackan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for beneficial ownership of 43 Graham Terrace succeeds; claim for Cae Haidd Bach fails; other relief largely conceded or agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Resulting Trusts, Beneficial Ownership, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Illegality Doctrine, Conspiracy to Defraud, Negligence, Conversion, Declarations of Trust
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Paul Knowlden
Claimant
Simin Nafis Tehrani
First Defendant
Stephen Puleston Williams
Second Defendant
Triumph Trading Company Limited
Third Defendant
Bobbetts Mackan
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Knowlden is entitled to beneficial ownership of 43 Graham Terrace
- 2 Whether Mr Knowlden is entitled to a beneficial interest in Cae Haidd Bach
- 3 Whether Triumph Trading and the Silver Owl Trust were established as vehicles for fraud
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Knowlden is entitled to beneficial ownership of 43 Graham Terrace as he was induced to transfer property into Triumph Trading by Ms Tehrani’s fraudulent representations. The trust deed is not binding due to fraud. He is not entitled to a beneficial interest in Cae Haidd Bach as the purported sale was a sham and no purchase money resulting trust arises. The doctrine of illegality does not bar Mr Knowlden’s claim as he does not need to rely on any unlawful conduct to establish his property rights.
Court Disposition
Claim for beneficial ownership of 43 Graham Terrace succeeds; claim for Cae Haidd Bach fails; other relief largely conceded or agreed.
Orders
- Mr Knowlden declared sole beneficial owner of 43 Graham Terrace (leasehold and freehold)
- Munster Road declared beneficially owned by Mr Knowlden
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment