Kliers v Schmerler & Anor (Rev 2)

Kliers v Schmerler & Anor (Rev 2)

The property was held by Mordechai Schmerler as a bare trustee for Miriam and Shlomo Kliers in the proportions of 75% and 25% respectively, based on their financial contributions and the common intention established by the evidence. The court found that the arrangement, though involving illegality (mortgage and benefit fraud), was the result of undue influence exerted by community and family leaders, and that public policy and proportionality did not require refusal of relief. The court exercised its discretion to refuse Mordechai Schmerler the right to cross-examine or make further submissions, given his repeated breaches and debarring.

Parties
Claimant: Miriam Kliers; First Defendant: Mordechai Schmerler; Second Defendant: Shlomo Kliers
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 April 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Property/trusts / Final Judgment After Trial; Ruling on Cross Examination Application
Outcome
Declarations granted in favour of Miriam Kliers; application for cross-examination by debarred defendant refused.
Legal Topics
Resulting Trusts, Constructive Trusts, Undue Influence, Illegality in Civil Claims, Debarring Orders, Beneficial Ownership, Cross Examination Rights
Trusts Property Law Family Law Civil Procedure Resulting Trusts Constructive Trusts Undue Influence Illegality in Civil Claims +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miriam Kliers

Claimant

Mordechai Schmerler

First Defendant

Shlomo Kliers

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Property/trusts / Final Judgment After Trial; Ruling on Cross Examination Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the property at 98 Kyverdale Road was held on trust by Mordechai Schmerler for Miriam and Shlomo Kliers
  2. 2 Whether the beneficial interests were 75% to Miriam Kliers and 25% to Shlomo Kliers
  3. 3 Whether the arrangement was vitiated by illegality (mortgage and benefit fraud)

Ratio Decidendi

The property was held by Mordechai Schmerler as a bare trustee for Miriam and Shlomo Kliers in the proportions of 75% and 25% respectively, based on their financial contributions and the common intention established by the evidence. The court found that the arrangement, though involving illegality (mortgage and benefit fraud), was the result of undue influence exerted by community and family leaders, and that public policy and proportionality did not require refusal of relief. The court exercised its discretion to refuse Mordechai Schmerler the right to cross-examine or make further submissions, given his repeated breaches and debarring.

Court Disposition

Declarations granted in favour of Miriam Kliers; application for cross-examination by debarred defendant refused.

Orders

  • Declaration that Mordechai Schmerler holds 98 Kyverdale Road on bare trust for Miriam Kliers (75%) and Shlomo Kliers (25%)
  • Directions for parties to submit draft orders regarding sale/distribution and disclosure to authorities