High Commissioner for Pakistan in the United Kingdom v Prince Mukkaram Jah, His Exalted Highness the 8th Nizam of Hyderabad
Pakistan's claim to beneficial ownership of the Fund, her invocation of the act of state/non-justiciability doctrine, and her limitation defences (except as to trust claims) all raise triable issues and cannot be summarily dismissed or struck out. The trust claims by India and the Princes are not time-barred and Pakistan's limitation defence to those claims has no real prospect of success and should be struck out. India's restitutionary claim against the Bank is arguable and should proceed to trial.
- Parties
- Claimant: The High Commissioner for Pakistan in the United Kingdom; Defendant/interpleader Claimant: Prince Mukkarram Jah, His Exalted Highness the 8th Nizam of Hyderabad; Defendant/interpleader Claimant: Prince Muffakham Jah; Defendant/interpleader Claimant: Shannon Consulting Limited; Defendant/interpleader Claimant: The Union of India; Defendant/interpleader Claimant: The President of India; Defendant/interpleader Claimant: Hillview Assets Holdings Limited; Defendant/stakeholder: National Westminster Bank PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (interpleader/stakeholder) / Summary Judgment and Strike Out Applications Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Applications for summary judgment and strike-out are dismissed except that Pakistan's limitation defence to the trust claims is to be struck out in principle, subject to case management.
- Legal Topics
- Resulting and Constructive Trusts, Act of State Doctrine, Non Justiciability, Limitation of Actions, Restitution/unjust Enrichment, Sovereign Immunity, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The High Commissioner for Pakistan in the United Kingdom
Claimant
Prince Mukkarram Jah, His Exalted Highness the 8th Nizam of Hyderabad
Defendant/interpleader Claimant
Prince Muffakham Jah
Defendant/interpleader Claimant
Shannon Consulting Limited
Defendant/interpleader Claimant
The Union of India
Defendant/interpleader Claimant
The President of India
Defendant/interpleader Claimant
Hillview Assets Holdings Limited
Defendant/interpleader Claimant
National Westminster Bank PLC
Defendant/stakeholder
Procedural Posture
Civil (interpleader/stakeholder) / Summary Judgment and Strike Out Applications Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Pakistan's claim to beneficial ownership of the Fund has a real prospect of success
- 2 Whether the doctrine of non-justiciability/act of state applies to bar adjudication
- 3 Whether limitation defences by Pakistan are abusive or have substantive merit
Ratio Decidendi
Pakistan's claim to beneficial ownership of the Fund, her invocation of the act of state/non-justiciability doctrine, and her limitation defences (except as to trust claims) all raise triable issues and cannot be summarily dismissed or struck out. The trust claims by India and the Princes are not time-barred and Pakistan's limitation defence to those claims has no real prospect of success and should be struck out. India's restitutionary claim against the Bank is arguable and should proceed to trial.
Court Disposition
Applications for summary judgment and strike-out are dismissed except that Pakistan's limitation defence to the trust claims is to be struck out in principle, subject to case management.
Orders
- All applications for summary judgment and strike-out are dismissed except as to Pakistan's limitation defence to trust claims.
- Pakistan's limitation defence to trust claims by India and the Princes is to be struck out in principle, subject to further case management.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment