Sandhu (t/a Isher Fashions UK) v Jet Star Retail Ltd (t/a Mark One) & Ors [2010] EWHC B17 (Mercantile) (21 April 2010)
The contract expressly provided for the rights and obligations of the parties in the event of insolvency or administration, and did not terminate automatically upon administration. The Claimant did not exercise any right to terminate or demand delivery up of the stock before it was sold. The Claimant had no immediate right to possession of the stock at the relevant time, so the claim for conversion fails.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC B17 (Mercantile)
- Parties
- Claimant: Bulbinder Singh Sandhu (trading as Isher Fashions UK); First Defendant: Jet Star Retail Limited t/a Mark One (In Administration); Second Defendant (joint Administrator): Michael Healy; Third Defendant (joint Administrator): Neil Bennett
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial/contract Dispute (preliminary Issue) / Judgment on Outstanding Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed on the outstanding preliminary issue.
- Legal Topics
- Retention of Title (rot) Clauses, Administration of Insolvent Companies, Conversion, Sale of Goods, Contract Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bulbinder Singh Sandhu (trading as Isher Fashions UK)
Claimant
Jet Star Retail Limited t/a Mark One (In Administration)
First Defendant
Michael Healy
Second Defendant (joint Administrator)
Neil Bennett
Third Defendant (joint Administrator)
Procedural Posture
Commercial/contract Dispute (preliminary Issue) / Judgment on Outstanding Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant has any claim in respect of goods held in stock by the First Defendant upon entering administration but sold before the sale of the business to Internacionale Retail Limited; or held in stock at the time of administration and delivered to Internacionale Retail Limited pursuant to the sale agreement.
Ratio Decidendi
The contract expressly provided for the rights and obligations of the parties in the event of insolvency or administration, and did not terminate automatically upon administration. The Claimant did not exercise any right to terminate or demand delivery up of the stock before it was sold. The Claimant had no immediate right to possession of the stock at the relevant time, so the claim for conversion fails.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed on the outstanding preliminary issue.
Orders
- Question 7(c) in the preliminary issue is answered 'no' in respect of both stock sold between 19 Nov and 25 Nov 2008 and stock sold to Internacionale.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment