QSA & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v National Police Chiefs' Council & Anor
The NPCC Policy of retaining all conviction data for 100 years is lawful, as it is clear, precise, non-discretionary, and serves the legitimate and important objective of maintaining a comprehensive criminal record system essential for the criminal justice process and public protection. The interference with Article 8 rights is proportionate, and the absence of an individual review mechanism does not render the policy unlawful.
- Parties
- Claimant: QSA; Claimant: Fiona Broadfoot; Claimant: ARB; First Defendant: National Police Chiefs’ Council; Second Defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Interested Party: College of Policing
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Remittal From Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Retention of Criminal Records, Article 8 ECHR (right to Private Life), Police National Computer Policy, Proportionality, Judicial Review of Administrative Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
QSA
Claimant
Fiona Broadfoot
Claimant
ARB
Claimant
National Police Chiefs’ Council
First Defendant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Second Defendant
College of Policing
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Remittal From Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the NPCC Policy of retaining conviction data for 100 years is 'in accordance with the law' under Article 8 ECHR
- 2 Whether the retention policy is necessary and proportionate in a democratic society under Article 8 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The NPCC Policy of retaining all conviction data for 100 years is lawful, as it is clear, precise, non-discretionary, and serves the legitimate and important objective of maintaining a comprehensive criminal record system essential for the criminal justice process and public protection. The interference with Article 8 rights is proportionate, and the absence of an individual review mechanism does not render the policy unlawful.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment