X and Y (Revocation of Adoption Orders), Re
The High Court does not have power under the inherent jurisdiction or s.31F(6) MFPA to revoke adoption orders made under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 on welfare grounds. The statutory scheme is comprehensive and only allows revocation in the narrow case of legitimation. The inherent jurisdiction cannot be used to add a wider power of revocation as this would be incompatible with the statutory scheme. Therefore, the application to revoke the adoption orders must be refused.
- Parties
- Applicant (adoptive Mother): AM; First Respondent (birth Mother): BM; Second Respondent (birth Father): BFX; Third Respondent (child): X; Fourth Respondent (child): Y; Fifth Respondent: Local Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family/adoption / Judgment on Application to Revoke Adoption Orders
- Outcome
- Application to revoke adoption orders refused; application to change surnames granted
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Adoption Orders, Inherent Jurisdiction, Children's Welfare, Change of Name
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AM
Applicant (adoptive Mother)
BM
First Respondent (birth Mother)
BFX
Second Respondent (birth Father)
X
Third Respondent (child)
Y
Fourth Respondent (child)
Local Authority
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family/adoption / Judgment on Application to Revoke Adoption Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has power to revoke adoption orders under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 on welfare grounds
- 2 Whether the inherent jurisdiction or s.31F(6) of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 provides such power
- 3 Whether the children's welfare and wishes justify revocation of the adoption orders
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court does not have power under the inherent jurisdiction or s.31F(6) MFPA to revoke adoption orders made under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 on welfare grounds. The statutory scheme is comprehensive and only allows revocation in the narrow case of legitimation. The inherent jurisdiction cannot be used to add a wider power of revocation as this would be incompatible with the statutory scheme. Therefore, the application to revoke the adoption orders must be refused.
Court Disposition
Application to revoke adoption orders refused; application to change surnames granted
Orders
- Application to revoke adoption orders in respect of X and Y is refused
- Both X and Y are permitted to change their surname to BM’s surname
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment