VX v KX & Ors [2024] EWCOP 78 (T2) (22 July 2024)
The complete breakdown in the relationship between the attorneys prevents proper consultation and best interests decision-making as required by the Mental Capacity Act 2005. VX is unable to comply with her duties as attorney, and BM and MS have failed to engage. The statutory test for revocation under s.22(3)-(4) is met.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCOP 78
- Parties
- Subject: SX; Attorney/respondent: VX; Attorney/respondent: KX; Attorney/respondent: AX; Attorney/respondent: BM; Attorney/respondent: MS; Child/observer: FN; Intervener: Local Authority; Intervener: Public Guardian; Litigation Friend for SX: Official Solicitor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection / Directions Hearing and Summary Determination
- Outcome
- Revocation of lasting powers of attorney for health and welfare in favour of VX, BM, and MS; property and affairs powers retained temporarily for AX and KX.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Lasting Power of Attorney, Best Interests, Breakdown of Attorney Relationships, Section 4 Mental Capacity Act 2005, Section 22 Mental Capacity Act 2005
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SX
Subject
VX
Attorney/respondent
KX
Attorney/respondent
AX
Attorney/respondent
BM
Attorney/respondent
MS
Attorney/respondent
FN
Child/observer
Local Authority
Intervener
Public Guardian
Intervener
Official Solicitor
Litigation Friend for SX
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection / Directions Hearing and Summary Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to revoke lasting powers of attorney for health and welfare due to breakdown in relationship and failure to act in best interests
- 2 Whether to revoke lasting powers of attorney for property and affairs
Ratio Decidendi
The complete breakdown in the relationship between the attorneys prevents proper consultation and best interests decision-making as required by the Mental Capacity Act 2005. VX is unable to comply with her duties as attorney, and BM and MS have failed to engage. The statutory test for revocation under s.22(3)-(4) is met.
Court Disposition
Revocation of lasting powers of attorney for health and welfare in favour of VX, BM, and MS; property and affairs powers retained temporarily for AX and KX.
Orders
- Revocation of lasting powers of attorney for health and welfare executed by SX in favour of VX, BM, and MS.
- AX and KX to disclaim property and affairs powers at first opportunity; failing which, court will revoke them.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment