F (A Child) [2014] EWCC B12 (Fam) (25 February 2014)
The court found that although the mother had made some improvements in her mental health and circumstances, the changes were not sufficient or reliable enough to meet the statutory threshold for granting permission to apply to revoke the Placement Order. The risk of emotional harm to the child from further delay and uncertainty outweighed the mother's prospects of success. The welfare of the child required that the Placement Order remain in place and that the plan for adoption proceed without further delay.
- Citation
- [2014] EWCC B12 (Fam)
- Parties
- Mother/applicant: Ms. W; Local Authority/respondent: Buckinghamshire County Council; Children's Guardian/respondent: Ms. Crossby; Child/subject: F
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Care and Placement Order Proceedings / Application for Permission to Revoke Placement Order; Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Permission to apply to revoke the Placement Order is refused.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Placement Order, Care Orders, Adoption, Parental Capacity, Change in Circumstances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms. W
Mother/applicant
Buckinghamshire County Council
Local Authority/respondent
Ms. Crossby
Children's Guardian/respondent
F
Child/subject
Procedural Posture
Care and Placement Order Proceedings / Application for Permission to Revoke Placement Order; Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there has been a sufficient change in circumstances to grant permission to apply to revoke the Placement Order under s.24 Adoption and Children Act 2002
- 2 Whether the welfare of the child requires the revocation of the Placement Order
- 3 Assessment of mother's mental health and parenting capacity
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the mother had made some improvements in her mental health and circumstances, the changes were not sufficient or reliable enough to meet the statutory threshold for granting permission to apply to revoke the Placement Order. The risk of emotional harm to the child from further delay and uncertainty outweighed the mother's prospects of success. The welfare of the child required that the Placement Order remain in place and that the plan for adoption proceed without further delay.
Court Disposition
Permission to apply to revoke the Placement Order is refused.
Orders
- The Placement Order remains in force.
- The local authority is to proceed with the plan for adoption as approved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment