H (Children), Re [2009] EWCA Civ 1293 (24 November 2009)
The judge was entitled, within the broad discretion afforded in child care proceedings, to refuse the application to revoke placement orders on the basis that the parents had not demonstrated a sufficiently lengthy period of being drug free, and that their timescale for recovery was inconsistent with the children's welfare and need for stability.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Civ 1293
- Parties
- Applicant Parent: Ms F; Applicant Parent: Mr H; First Respondent: Local Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (family Law Children) / Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Placement Orders, Care Proceedings, Parental Drug Addiction, Judicial Discretion, Adoption Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms F
Applicant Parent
Mr H
Applicant Parent
Local Authority
First Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family Law Children) / Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing to revoke placement orders for the children
- 2 Whether it was procedurally unfair to determine the application at a directions hearing without further evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled, within the broad discretion afforded in child care proceedings, to refuse the application to revoke placement orders on the basis that the parents had not demonstrated a sufficiently lengthy period of being drug free, and that their timescale for recovery was inconsistent with the children's welfare and need for stability.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment