York House (Chelsea) Ltd v Thompson & Anor
The leases granted by the defendants were exempt disposals under s.4(2)(e) (gift to a member of the landlord’s family) or s.4(2)(h) (intra-family transfer) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. The grant of a lease can constitute a gift even where mutual covenants exist, provided no value is received by the landlord. The statutory purpose and language support a broad interpretation of these exemptions. Accordingly, the statutory right of first refusal was not triggered and the claim fails.
- Parties
- Claimant: York House (Chelsea) Limited; First Defendant: Edward Allen Victor Thompson; Second Defendant: Domitila Thompson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Right of First Refusal, Relevant Disposal, Leasehold Reform, Common Parts, Appurtenances, Family Exemptions, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
York House (Chelsea) Limited
Claimant
Edward Allen Victor Thompson
First Defendant
Domitila Thompson
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of leases by the defendants constituted relevant disposals under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 requiring notice to qualifying tenants
- 2 Whether the leases fell within the family gift or intra-family transfer exemptions under s.4(2)(e) or (h) of the 1987 Act
- 3 Whether the demised premises were common parts or appurtenances to which the Act applies
Ratio Decidendi
The leases granted by the defendants were exempt disposals under s.4(2)(e) (gift to a member of the landlord’s family) or s.4(2)(h) (intra-family transfer) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. The grant of a lease can constitute a gift even where mutual covenants exist, provided no value is received by the landlord. The statutory purpose and language support a broad interpretation of these exemptions. Accordingly, the statutory right of first refusal was not triggered and the claim fails.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment