Banks v Blount [2022] EWHC 1491 (QB) (15 June 2022)
The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge's findings on the width of the right of way, the existence of substantial interference by the defendant, the assessment of damages, and the terms of the injunctions were all supported by evidence and correct in law. The defendant's grounds of appeal were found to be without merit.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1491 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: James Banks; Claimant/respondent: Helen Banks; Defendant/appellant: Gary Blount
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Right of Way, Easements, Injunctions, Damages, Appeals Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Banks
Claimant/respondent
Helen Banks
Claimant/respondent
Gary Blount
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant substantially interfered with the claimants' right of way by obstruction and failure to maintain.
- 2 Whether the judge erred in defining the width of the right of way, particularly regarding verge space.
- 3 Whether the damages and injunctions awarded were appropriate and sufficiently specific.
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge's findings on the width of the right of way, the existence of substantial interference by the defendant, the assessment of damages, and the terms of the injunctions were all supported by evidence and correct in law. The defendant's grounds of appeal were found to be without merit.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed on all grounds.
- Original injunctions and damages order upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment