Abdullah, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2009] EWHC 1771 (Admin) (15 June 2009)
Refusal of a residence card to an extended family member under the EEA Regulations 2006 does not give rise to a suspensive right of appeal preventing removal. Regulation 29 suspends removal only for appeals against refusal of admission or removal, not for refusal of a residence card. The claimant's removal was not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 1771 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Abdullah; First Defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Second Defendant: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Right of Appeal Under EEA Regulations, Suspensive Effect of Appeals, Residence Card for Extended Family Members, Judicial Review of Removal Decisions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdullah
Claimant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
First Defendant
Asylum and Immigration Tribunal
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refusal of a residence card to an extended family member under the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006 gives rise to a suspensive right of appeal preventing removal
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State was required to bring the claimant back to the UK after removal
- 3 Whether Regulation 17(5) duty to examine personal circumstances applied
Ratio Decidendi
Refusal of a residence card to an extended family member under the EEA Regulations 2006 does not give rise to a suspensive right of appeal preventing removal. Regulation 29 suspends removal only for appeals against refusal of admission or removal, not for refusal of a residence card. The claimant's removal was not unlawful, and the Secretary of State is not required to bring him back to the UK.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal is a matter for the Court of Appeal to decide.
- Detailed assessment of claimant's costs ordered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment