Besley v John
The right of common of grazing does not include the right to bring feed onto the land, as the right is limited to what the sheep can eat from the grass growing on the common. However, the right to attend to the welfare of the sheep is an incident of the right of common, and in modern circumstances, this may include the use of vehicles for shepherding and welfare purposes, provided such use is reasonable and does not cause unnecessary interference or damage to the landowner's interests. The expansion and mowing of the golf course did not materially interfere with Mr John's grazing rights.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Besley; Appellant/defendant: John
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Rights of Common, Grazing Rights, Ancillary Rights, Reasonable Use of Land, Interference With Rights of Common
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Besley
Respondent/claimant
John
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the right of common of grazing includes the ancillary right to bring feed onto the land
- 2 Whether the right of common of grazing includes the right to use vehicles for general shepherding purposes
- 3 Whether the expansion and mowing of the golf course unreasonably interfered with the right of common
Ratio Decidendi
The right of common of grazing does not include the right to bring feed onto the land, as the right is limited to what the sheep can eat from the grass growing on the common. However, the right to attend to the welfare of the sheep is an incident of the right of common, and in modern circumstances, this may include the use of vehicles for shepherding and welfare purposes, provided such use is reasonable and does not cause unnecessary interference or damage to the landowner's interests. The expansion and mowing of the golf course did not materially interfere with Mr John's grazing rights.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Parties to agree and submit an appropriate order regulating vehicle use for shepherding and welfare purposes, subject to court approval
- Appellant to pay two-thirds of respondent's costs in the Court of Appeal and two-thirds of costs in the court below
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment