Tibbs v London Borough of Islington [2005] EWCA Civ 1179 (13 September 2005)
The judge was entitled to find, on the evidence, that Mrs Tibbs did not occupy 28B Michison Road as her only or principal home and had no intention to return, thus failing the tenant condition under Section 81 of the Housing Act 1985. There was no real prospect of success on appeal.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 1179
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Catherine Tibbs; Claimant/appellant: Ronald Tibbs; Defendant/respondent: London Borough of Islington
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Right to Buy, Possession Proceedings, Principal Home Requirement, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Catherine Tibbs
Claimant/appellant
Ronald Tibbs
Claimant/appellant
London Borough of Islington
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Tibbs occupied 28B Michison Road as her only or principal home under Section 81 of the Housing Act 1985
- 2 Whether the judge at first instance erred in assessing the evidence regarding occupation and intention to return
- 3 Whether new evidence or procedural errors justified an appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to find, on the evidence, that Mrs Tibbs did not occupy 28B Michison Road as her only or principal home and had no intention to return, thus failing the tenant condition under Section 81 of the Housing Act 1985. There was no real prospect of success on appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment