G, R (on the application of) v X School & Ors
Where disciplinary proceedings in a school lead to a statutory referral for possible barring from working with children, and the outcome of those proceedings will have a substantial effect on the individual's right to practise his profession, Article 6 ECHR is engaged. In such circumstances, Article 6 requires that the individual be afforded the opportunity for legal representation in the disciplinary process.
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent to the Cross Appeal: The Governors of X School; Respondent/cross Appellant: The Queen on the Application of G; Intervener: Y City Council; Interested Party: The Secretary of State for Children and Schools and Families; Intervener: The Equality and Human Rights Commission
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Cross-appeal moot
- Legal Topics
- Right to Legal Representation in Disciplinary Proceedings, Article 6 ECHR (fair Trial), Employment Dismissal and Barred Lists, Procedural Fairness in Professional Discipline
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Governors of X School
Appellant/respondent to the Cross Appeal
The Queen on the Application of G
Respondent/cross Appellant
Y City Council
Intervener
The Secretary of State for Children and Schools and Families
Interested Party
The Equality and Human Rights Commission
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether disciplinary proceedings determining dismissal and referral to barred list engage Article 6 ECHR civil rights
- 2 Whether Article 6 ECHR requires legal representation in such disciplinary proceedings
- 3 Whether the disciplinary and barred list procedures are sufficiently connected for Article 6 purposes
Ratio Decidendi
Where disciplinary proceedings in a school lead to a statutory referral for possible barring from working with children, and the outcome of those proceedings will have a substantial effect on the individual's right to practise his profession, Article 6 ECHR is engaged. In such circumstances, Article 6 requires that the individual be afforded the opportunity for legal representation in the disciplinary process.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Cross-appeal moot
Orders
- The claimant is entitled to the opportunity for legal representation at the disciplinary and appeal hearings.
- No substantive order on the cross-appeal; costs to be determined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment