McIntyre & Anor v The Home Office (Rev1) [2014] EWHC B13 (QB) (30 January 2014)
The claimants' accounts were found to be inaccurate, evasive, and motivated by pecuniary gain. Contemporaneous evidence showed the impact was trivial, no damage was caused, and any alleged injuries were non-compensable. The evidence of the defendant witnesses was accepted as truthful. Therefore, the claims are dismissed.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC B13 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Paula McIntyre; Claimant: Louise Hennessy; Defendant Witness: Denise Withey; Defendant Witness: Raymond Stevens; Defendant Witness: Jacqueline Woodhall
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Claim / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Road Traffic Accident, Whiplash Claims, Credibility of Witnesses, False Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paula McIntyre
Claimant
Louise Hennessy
Claimant
Denise Withey
Defendant Witness
Raymond Stevens
Defendant Witness
Jacqueline Woodhall
Defendant Witness
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants suffered compensable injuries as a result of the car accident on 23 October 2008
- 2 Whether the claimants' accounts of injury are credible
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants' accounts were found to be inaccurate, evasive, and motivated by pecuniary gain. Contemporaneous evidence showed the impact was trivial, no damage was caused, and any alleged injuries were non-compensable. The evidence of the defendant witnesses was accepted as truthful. Therefore, the claims are dismissed.
Court Disposition
claims dismissed
Orders
- Each claim is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment