Quartey, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 745 (28 June 2024)
The original sentence was unduly lenient as the reductions for mitigation and the suspension of the sentence were excessive and not properly structured, but given the offender's progress and rehabilitation, the Court of Appeal exercised its discretion not to increase the sentence.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 745
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Offender/respondent: Maximus Quartey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference (attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Unduly Lenient Sentence Reference
- Outcome
- Sentence found unduly lenient but not increased; reference allowed but no variation of sentence ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Sentencing, Unduly Lenient Sentences, Suspended Sentences, Mitigation, Youth Offenders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Maximus Quartey
Offender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference (attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Unduly Lenient Sentence Reference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for three robberies was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in reductions for mitigation and in suspending the sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was unduly lenient as the reductions for mitigation and the suspension of the sentence were excessive and not properly structured, but given the offender's progress and rehabilitation, the Court of Appeal exercised its discretion not to increase the sentence.
Court Disposition
Sentence found unduly lenient but not increased; reference allowed but no variation of sentence ordered.
Orders
- Leave to refer granted
- Sentence found unduly lenient
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment