Committeri v Club Méditerranée SA (t/a Club Med Business) [2018] EWCA Civ 1889 (09 August 2018)

Committeri v Club Méditerranée SA (t/a Club Med Business) [2018] EWCA Civ 1889 (09 August 2018)

The claim under Article L211-16 of the French Code de Tourisme is properly characterised as contractual in nature for the purposes of Rome I, as it is based on obligations arising from a contract freely entered into between the parties. The contract is indispensable to the claim, and the strict liability imposed by the Code is an enhancement of the contractual obligation, not a separate non-contractual right. Therefore, Rome I applies, and the English law choice of law clause governs, resulting in the claim failing.

Citation
[2018] EWCA Civ 1889
Parties
Appellant/claimant: Mr Cristiano Committeri; 1st Respondent/1st Defendant: Club Méditerranée SA (T/A Club Med Business); 2nd Respondent/3rd Defendant: Generali Assurances IARD SA
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rome I Regulation, Rome II Regulation, Package Travel Directive, Choice of Law, Strict Liability, Contractual Vs Non Contractual Obligations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Cristiano Committeri

Appellant/claimant

Club Méditerranée SA (T/A Club Med Business)

1st Respondent/1st Defendant

Generali Assurances IARD SA

2nd Respondent/3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the pleaded strict liability claim under Article L211-16 of the French Code de Tourisme is contractual or non-contractual for the purposes of Rome I and Rome II Regulations
  2. 2 Whether French law characterises the claim as contractual or non-contractual

Ratio Decidendi

The claim under Article L211-16 of the French Code de Tourisme is properly characterised as contractual in nature for the purposes of Rome I, as it is based on obligations arising from a contract freely entered into between the parties. The contract is indispensable to the claim, and the strict liability imposed by the Code is an enhancement of the contractual obligation, not a separate non-contractual right. Therefore, Rome I applies, and the English law choice of law clause governs, resulting in the claim failing.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.