Committeri v Club Méditerranée SA (t/a Club Med Business) [2018] EWCA Civ 1889 (09 August 2018)
The claim under Article L211-16 of the French Code de Tourisme is properly characterised as contractual in nature for the purposes of Rome I, as it is based on obligations arising from a contract freely entered into between the parties. The contract is indispensable to the claim, and the strict liability imposed by the Code is an enhancement of the contractual obligation, not a separate non-contractual right. Therefore, Rome I applies, and the English law choice of law clause governs, resulting in the claim failing.
- Citation
- [2018] EWCA Civ 1889
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Mr Cristiano Committeri; 1st Respondent/1st Defendant: Club Méditerranée SA (T/A Club Med Business); 2nd Respondent/3rd Defendant: Generali Assurances IARD SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rome I Regulation, Rome II Regulation, Package Travel Directive, Choice of Law, Strict Liability, Contractual Vs Non Contractual Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Cristiano Committeri
Appellant/claimant
Club Méditerranée SA (T/A Club Med Business)
1st Respondent/1st Defendant
Generali Assurances IARD SA
2nd Respondent/3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pleaded strict liability claim under Article L211-16 of the French Code de Tourisme is contractual or non-contractual for the purposes of Rome I and Rome II Regulations
- 2 Whether French law characterises the claim as contractual or non-contractual
Ratio Decidendi
The claim under Article L211-16 of the French Code de Tourisme is properly characterised as contractual in nature for the purposes of Rome I, as it is based on obligations arising from a contract freely entered into between the parties. The contract is indispensable to the claim, and the strict liability imposed by the Code is an enhancement of the contractual obligation, not a separate non-contractual right. Therefore, Rome I applies, and the English law choice of law clause governs, resulting in the claim failing.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment