Trade Electronix Ltd v Best Buy Today (Wholesale) Ltd (In Administration) & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 828 (29 July 2009)
There was no evidence capable of supporting the conclusion that Trade Electronix Limited had entered into a binding contract to buy £150,000 worth of goods from Best Buy Today (Wholesale) Limited; therefore, Trade Electronix Limited's claim was bound to fail.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Civ 828
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Trade Electronix Limited; First Defendant/respondent: Best Buy Today (Wholesale) Limited (in administration); Second Defendant/respondent: Davenham Trade Finance Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sale of Goods, Transfer of Title, Conversion, Appropriation of Goods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trade Electronix Limited
Claimant/appellant
Best Buy Today (Wholesale) Limited (in administration)
First Defendant/respondent
Davenham Trade Finance Limited
Second Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding contract existed between Trade Electronix Limited and Best Buy Today (Wholesale) Limited for the purchase of Argos return stock
- 2 Whether title to the goods passed to Trade Electronix Limited
- 3 Whether Davenham Trade Finance Limited acquired good title under section 24 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence capable of supporting the conclusion that Trade Electronix Limited had entered into a binding contract to buy £150,000 worth of goods from Best Buy Today (Wholesale) Limited; therefore, Trade Electronix Limited's claim was bound to fail.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no further orders made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment