Lecta Paper UK Ltd, Re [2019] EWHC 3615 (Ch) (19 December 2019)
Adequate notice was given to creditors, the differences between noteholders were not material for class composition, and the court had jurisdiction to convene the meeting as the company is incorporated in England and Wales and liable to be wound up under the Insolvency Act 1986.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 3615 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant Company: Lecta Paper UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement Application / Application to Convene Creditors' Meeting
- Outcome
- Order granted to convene a meeting of a single class of scheme creditors.
- Legal Topics
- Scheme of Arrangement, Class Composition of Creditors, Jurisdiction Under Companies Act 2006
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lecta Paper UK Limited
Claimant Company
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement Application / Application to Convene Creditors' Meeting
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient notice was given to scheme creditors for the convening hearing
- 2 Whether a single class of scheme creditors is appropriate
- 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to sanction the scheme
Ratio Decidendi
Adequate notice was given to creditors, the differences between noteholders were not material for class composition, and the court had jurisdiction to convene the meeting as the company is incorporated in England and Wales and liable to be wound up under the Insolvency Act 1986.
Court Disposition
Order granted to convene a meeting of a single class of scheme creditors.
Orders
- Meeting of a single class of scheme creditors to be convened to consider the proposed scheme of arrangement.
- Directions for convening the scheme meeting approved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment