Haya Holdco 2 PLC, Re [2022] EWHC 2732 (Ch) (09 June 2022)
The court sanctioned the scheme because statutory requirements were met, the class was fairly represented and acted bona fide, the scheme was reasonable for creditors, there was no defect in the scheme, and the proposed modifications were technical, necessary, and not materially adverse to any creditor.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 2732 (Ch)
- Parties
- Company: Haya Holdco 2 plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement Under Companies Act 2006 / Sanction Hearing
- Outcome
- Scheme sanctioned
- Legal Topics
- Scheme of Arrangement, Creditors' Rights, Cross Border Recognition, Restructuring
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Haya Holdco 2 plc
Company
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement Under Companies Act 2006 / Sanction Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory requirements for sanctioning a scheme of arrangement under section 899 of the Companies Act 2006 have been met
- 2 Whether the class of creditors was fairly represented and acted bona fide
- 3 Whether the scheme is one that an intelligent and honest person might reasonably approve
Ratio Decidendi
The court sanctioned the scheme because statutory requirements were met, the class was fairly represented and acted bona fide, the scheme was reasonable for creditors, there was no defect in the scheme, and the proposed modifications were technical, necessary, and not materially adverse to any creditor.
Court Disposition
Scheme sanctioned
Orders
- The court sanctions the modified scheme of arrangement in the form presented.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment