British Aviation Insurance Company Ltd, Re [2005] EWHC 1621 (Ch) (21 July 2005)
The scheme meeting was properly constituted and notified as far as reasonably practicable. The class of scheme creditors was correctly identified as having sufficiently similar rights. The process for valuation and adjudication of claims, including IBNR claims, is fair and reasonable. The scheme is not inherently unfair and is one which an intelligent and honest member of the class might reasonably approve. The court's discretion should be exercised to sanction the scheme.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 1621 (Ch)
- Parties
- Petitioner: British Aviation Insurance Company Limited; Respondents/opposing Creditors: Opposing Creditors (18 US corporations, direct insureds); Opposing Creditors: United Technologies Corporation & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement (companies Act 1985, S.425) / Final Sanction Hearing After Creditors' Meeting
- Outcome
- Scheme sanctioned
- Legal Topics
- Scheme of Arrangement, Solvent Insurance Run Off, Class Constitution of Creditors, Notice to Creditors, Valuation of IBNR Claims, Court's Discretion to Sanction Scheme
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
British Aviation Insurance Company Limited
Petitioner
Opposing Creditors (18 US corporations, direct insureds)
Respondents/opposing Creditors
United Technologies Corporation & Ors
Opposing Creditors
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement (companies Act 1985, S.425) / Final Sanction Hearing After Creditors' Meeting
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the scheme meeting was properly constituted and notified
- 2 Whether the classes of creditors were correctly identified
- 3 Whether the scheme is fair and reasonable to all creditors, especially those with IBNR claims
Ratio Decidendi
The scheme meeting was properly constituted and notified as far as reasonably practicable. The class of scheme creditors was correctly identified as having sufficiently similar rights. The process for valuation and adjudication of claims, including IBNR claims, is fair and reasonable. The scheme is not inherently unfair and is one which an intelligent and honest member of the class might reasonably approve. The court's discretion should be exercised to sanction the scheme.
Court Disposition
Scheme sanctioned
Orders
- The scheme of arrangement is sanctioned under s.425 Companies Act 1985.
- All scheme creditors are bound by the terms of the scheme as approved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment