Port Finance Investment Ltd, Re [2021] EWHC 378 (Ch) (23 February 2021)
The court ordered the convening of a single meeting of Scheme Creditors to consider the proposed scheme of arrangement, finding that the Scheme Company is a company for the purposes of Part 26, that the scheme constitutes a compromise or arrangement with its creditors, and that there is no jurisdictional roadblock to including releases of rights against third parties. The court held that, despite some differences in rights (consent fee, cash option, advisers' fees), these did not fracture the class at this stage. Although notice was arguably short, the court exercised its discretion to allow all issues to be raised at the sanction hearing rather than adjourn the convening hearing.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 378 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant/scheme Company: Port Finance Investment Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement Under Part 26 Companies Act 2006 / Application for Order Convening Creditors' Meeting
- Outcome
- Order granted to convene a single meeting of Scheme Creditors to consider the scheme of arrangement.
- Legal Topics
- Schemes of Arrangement, Jurisdiction, Class Composition, Notice Requirements, Third Party Releases, Consent Fees, Advisers' Fees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Port Finance Investment Limited
Applicant/scheme Company
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement Under Part 26 Companies Act 2006 / Application for Order Convening Creditors' Meeting
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should order a meeting of creditors to consider a scheme of arrangement under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006
- 2 Whether the Scheme Company is a 'company' for the purposes of Part 26
- 3 Whether the scheme constitutes a 'compromise or arrangement' between the company and its creditors
Ratio Decidendi
The court ordered the convening of a single meeting of Scheme Creditors to consider the proposed scheme of arrangement, finding that the Scheme Company is a company for the purposes of Part 26, that the scheme constitutes a compromise or arrangement with its creditors, and that there is no jurisdictional roadblock to including releases of rights against third parties. The court held that, despite some differences in rights (consent fee, cash option, advisers' fees), these did not fracture the class at this stage. Although notice was arguably short, the court exercised its discretion to allow all issues to be raised at the sanction hearing rather than adjourn the convening hearing.
Court Disposition
Order granted to convene a single meeting of Scheme Creditors to consider the scheme of arrangement.
Orders
- Meeting of Scheme Creditors to be convened to consider and, if thought fit, approve the scheme of arrangement under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006.
- Scheme Creditors permitted to raise any relevant issues at the sanction hearing, notwithstanding short notice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment