Uniq Plc, Re
The scheme of arrangement was sanctioned because it was the only viable solution to the company's pension deficit, complied with statutory requirements, provided substantial benefit to members by preserving some value in their shares, and any financial assistance or procedural errors were either lawful or properly addressed.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Uniq plc; Respondents: Members of Uniq plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement (companies Act) / Judgment on Sanction of Scheme
- Outcome
- Scheme of arrangement sanctioned; reduction of capital confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Schemes of Arrangement, Financial Assistance, Reduction of Capital, Pension Scheme Deficits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Uniq plc
Petitioner
Members of Uniq plc
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement (companies Act) / Judgment on Sanction of Scheme
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the scheme of arrangement should be sanctioned under section 899 of the Companies Act 2006
- 2 Whether the scheme provides sufficient benefit to members to constitute a valid arrangement
- 3 Whether the provision of financial assistance contravenes section 678 of the Companies Act 2006
Ratio Decidendi
The scheme of arrangement was sanctioned because it was the only viable solution to the company's pension deficit, complied with statutory requirements, provided substantial benefit to members by preserving some value in their shares, and any financial assistance or procedural errors were either lawful or properly addressed.
Court Disposition
Scheme of arrangement sanctioned; reduction of capital confirmed.
Orders
- The scheme of arrangement under section 899 Companies Act 2006 is sanctioned.
- The reduction of capital as provided in the scheme is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment