S, R (on the application of) v The Governing Body of YP School [2003] EWCA Civ 1306 (11 July 2003)
In school disciplinary proceedings where the accusation amounts to a crime, the criminal standard of proof must be applied; as it was not clearly applied in this case, the exclusion decision must be quashed.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 1306
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: The Queen (on the application of S); Defendant/respondent: The Governing Body of Y P School
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court (administrative Court) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- School Exclusion, Standard of Proof, Procedural Fairness, Article 6 ECHR, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen (on the application of S)
Claimant/appellant
The Governing Body of Y P School
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court (administrative Court) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate standard of proof for a disciplinary accusation amounting to a crime in a school context?
- 2 Whether the exclusion process satisfied procedural fairness requirements
- 3 Compatibility of section 64 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 with Article 6 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
In school disciplinary proceedings where the accusation amounts to a crime, the criminal standard of proof must be applied; as it was not clearly applied in this case, the exclusion decision must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of Maurice Kay J set aside
- Certiorari granted to quash the decision of the governing body excluding S
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment