Revell-Reade v The Serious Fraud Office & Anor

Revell-Reade v The Serious Fraud Office & Anor

The claimant's repeated and significant failures to provide full and accurate disclosure of his assets, income, and financial dealings, coupled with contradictory and late statements, justified the Serious Fraud Office's application for search and seizure warrants. The application was fair and balanced, and the absence of reasons or a hearing record did not vitiate the warrants. The judicial review is refused.

Parties
Claimant: Jeffrey Robert Revell-Reade; First Defendant: The Serious Fraud Office; Second Defendant: Southwark Crown Court
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Judicial Review of Search and Seizure Warrants
Outcome
Application for judicial review refused
Legal Topics
Search and Seizure Warrants, Disclosure Obligations, Ex Parte Applications, Restraint Orders, Confiscation Proceedings
Criminal Law Judicial Review Proceeds of Crime Search and Seizure Warrants Disclosure Obligations Ex Parte Applications Restraint Orders Confiscation Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jeffrey Robert Revell-Reade

Claimant

The Serious Fraud Office

First Defendant

Southwark Crown Court

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Judicial Review of Search and Seizure Warrants

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the search and seizure warrants were lawfully granted under section 352 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
  2. 2 Whether the Serious Fraud Office failed in its duty of full and frank disclosure
  3. 3 Whether the judge's failure to give reasons or record the hearing vitiated the warrants

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's repeated and significant failures to provide full and accurate disclosure of his assets, income, and financial dealings, coupled with contradictory and late statements, justified the Serious Fraud Office's application for search and seizure warrants. The application was fair and balanced, and the absence of reasons or a hearing record did not vitiate the warrants. The judicial review is refused.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review refused

Orders

  • Judicial review refused; search and seizure warrants upheld