Dost & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Crown Court at Manchester & Anor [2024] EWHC 2799 (Admin) (08 November 2024)
No bad faith or egregious conduct by HMRC; errors were innocent and promptly rectified; insufficient basis to deprive HMRC of statutory opportunity to apply under s.59 CJPA for retention of seized items.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 2799 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Mohammed Naseem Dost; Claimant: Tariq Ali Nasim; Claimant: Wakas Nasim; First Defendant: THE CROWN COURT AT MANCHESTER; Second Defendant: HM REVENUE AND CUSTOMS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Relief After Concession of Claim
- Outcome
- Application for mandatory return of seized items and prohibition on s.59 CJPA application refused.
- Legal Topics
- Search Warrants, Retention of Seized Property, Duty of Candour, Section 59 CJPA, Proceeds of Crime Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohammed Naseem Dost
Claimant
Tariq Ali Nasim
Claimant
Wakas Nasim
Claimant
THE CROWN COURT AT MANCHESTER
First Defendant
HM REVENUE AND CUSTOMS
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Relief After Concession of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC should be prohibited from applying under s.59 CJPA to retain items seized under unlawful warrants
- 2 Whether a mandatory order for return of seized items should be made
Ratio Decidendi
No bad faith or egregious conduct by HMRC; errors were innocent and promptly rectified; insufficient basis to deprive HMRC of statutory opportunity to apply under s.59 CJPA for retention of seized items.
Court Disposition
Application for mandatory return of seized items and prohibition on s.59 CJPA application refused.
Orders
- HMRC permitted to apply under s.59 CJPA for retention of seized items.
- No mandatory order for return of seized items granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment