Olympic Airlines SA Pension & Life Insurance Scheme v Olympic Airlines SA
The airline did not have an establishment in England as of 20 July 2010 because it had ceased all commercial operations, dismissed its workforce, retained only ad hoc staff for winding-up, and had no assets of value; the activities did not amount to non-transitory, external, market-facing economic activity required by the Regulation.
- Parties
- Petitioners/respondents: The Trustees of the Olympic Airlines SA Pension & Life Insurance Scheme; Respondent/appellant: Olympic Airlines SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Secondary Insolvency Proceedings, Jurisdiction, Establishment Under EU Insolvency Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Trustees of the Olympic Airlines SA Pension & Life Insurance Scheme
Petitioners/respondents
Olympic Airlines SA
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Olympic Airlines SA had an 'establishment' in England under Article 2(h) of Council Regulation (EC) 1346/2000 at the relevant date to justify secondary insolvency proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The airline did not have an establishment in England as of 20 July 2010 because it had ceased all commercial operations, dismissed its workforce, retained only ad hoc staff for winding-up, and had no assets of value; the activities did not amount to non-transitory, external, market-facing economic activity required by the Regulation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- No jurisdiction for trustees to commence secondary insolvency proceedings in England as of 20 July 2010
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment