Norfolk Homes Ltd v North Norfolk District Council & Anor [2020] EWHC 2265 (QB) (20 August 2020)
The obligations in the 2012 section 106 agreement do not apply to development carried out under the 2015 section 73 planning permission because the agreement is expressly limited to the original planning permission and does not extend to subsequent permissions unless the wording so provides. The court rejected the respondent's argument for implied terms, finding no justification to extend the agreement's effect beyond its express language.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 2265 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Norfolk Homes Limited; First Defendant: North Norfolk District Council; Second Defendant: Norfolk County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (planning/administrative) / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Section 106 Agreements, Interpretation of Planning Obligations, Section 73 Permissions, Affordable Housing, Local Land Charges
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Norfolk Homes Limited
Claimant
North Norfolk District Council
First Defendant
Norfolk County Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (planning/administrative) / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the obligations in the 2012 section 106 agreement apply to development carried out under the 2015 section 73 planning permission
- 2 Whether additional wording should be implied into the 2012 agreement to extend its effect to subsequent section 73 permissions
Ratio Decidendi
The obligations in the 2012 section 106 agreement do not apply to development carried out under the 2015 section 73 planning permission because the agreement is expressly limited to the original planning permission and does not extend to subsequent permissions unless the wording so provides. The court rejected the respondent's argument for implied terms, finding no justification to extend the agreement's effect beyond its express language.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Declaration granted that development under the 2015 permission is not subject to the owner's obligations in the 2012 agreement
- Order requiring NNDC to remove reference to the 2012 agreement from the local land charges register within 28 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment