Headway Plc v Eastearly Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 793 (23 July 2009)
Section 75(6) of the Pensions Act 1995 requires that any scheme provision limiting liabilities by reference to assets be disregarded for section 75 debt calculation, enabling the trustee's Arrangement to increase the debt. Section 19 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 permits partial buy-out of GMPs, but the scheme rules may restrict implementation unless high GMP members consent. If consent is not obtained, a truncated Arrangement can be lawfully implemented for other members.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Civ 793
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Headway PLC; Respondent/claimant: Eastearly Limited; Intervener: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; Arrangement permitted subject to consent or truncation.
- Legal Topics
- Section 75 Debt Calculation, Pension Scheme Winding Up, Guaranteed Minimum Pensions (gmps), Partial Buy Out, Statutory Discharge of Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Headway PLC
Appellant/defendant
Eastearly Limited
Respondent/claimant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustee can lawfully implement an arrangement to increase the section 75 debt by completing a partial buy-out before quantifying the debt
- 2 Whether partial buy-out of GMPs is permitted under statutory and scheme provisions
Ratio Decidendi
Section 75(6) of the Pensions Act 1995 requires that any scheme provision limiting liabilities by reference to assets be disregarded for section 75 debt calculation, enabling the trustee's Arrangement to increase the debt. Section 19 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 permits partial buy-out of GMPs, but the scheme rules may restrict implementation unless high GMP members consent. If consent is not obtained, a truncated Arrangement can be lawfully implemented for other members.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; Arrangement permitted subject to consent or truncation.
Orders
- Counsel to agree form of order reflecting judgment outcome.
- Arrangement may be implemented for consenting high GMP members and all low GMP members.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment