London Borough of Merton v Richards [2005] EWCA Civ 639 (11 May 2005)
The council failed to prove, even on the balance of probabilities, that the respondent knowingly made a false statement or instigated her mother to do so. The statutory requirement under Ground 5 was not satisfied as there was no evidence of knowledge or instigation by the tenant.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 639
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: London Borough of Merton; Defendant/respondent: Sonia Jane Richards
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Secure Tenancy, Grounds for Possession, False Statement, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
London Borough of Merton
Claimant/appellant
Sonia Jane Richards
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tenant knowingly or recklessly made a false statement inducing the grant of tenancy under Housing Act 1985, Schedule 2, Ground 5
- 2 Whether a false statement made by a person acting at the tenant's instigation satisfies Ground 5
- 3 Proper construction of 'instigation' under Ground 5
Ratio Decidendi
The council failed to prove, even on the balance of probabilities, that the respondent knowingly made a false statement or instigated her mother to do so. The statutory requirement under Ground 5 was not satisfied as there was no evidence of knowledge or instigation by the tenant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs, subject to detailed assessment
- Public funding assessment ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment