DSG Retail Ltd v Information Commissioner [2026] EWCA Civ 140 (19 February 2025)
The security duty under the Data Protection Act 1998 requires a data controller to take appropriate technical and organisational measures against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data, including by third parties, regardless of whether those third parties can identify the data subjects. The scope of 'personal data' for this duty is determined by identifiability to the data controller, not to third parties. This interpretation aligns with the statutory language, legislative purpose, and relevant EU law and case law.
- Citation
- [2026] EWCA Civ 140
- Parties
- Respondent/appellant: DSG Retail Limited; Appellant/respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Security Duty, Personal Data Definition, Data Controller Obligations, Interpretation of Data Protection Act 1998, Directive 95/46/ec, Appropriate Technical and Organisational Measures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DSG Retail Limited
Respondent/appellant
The Information Commissioner
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the security duty under the Data Protection Act 1998 require a data controller to take measures against unauthorised processing by third parties who cannot identify the data subjects?
- 2 Is the scope of 'personal data' for security duty purposes determined by identifiability to the data controller or to third parties?
Ratio Decidendi
The security duty under the Data Protection Act 1998 requires a data controller to take appropriate technical and organisational measures against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data, including by third parties, regardless of whether those third parties can identify the data subjects. The scope of 'personal data' for this duty is determined by identifiability to the data controller, not to third parties. This interpretation aligns with the statutory language, legislative purpose, and relevant EU law and case law.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Case remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be determined in accordance with this judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment