Kuenyehia & Ors v International Hospitals Group Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 274 (27 February 2007)
Claimants failed to provide credible or intelligible evidence of impecuniosity; they produced substantial sums when ordered; no factual basis for claim that security would stifle proceedings; court exercised discretion afresh and ordered security.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Civ 274
- Parties
- Claimant / Respondent: Kuenyehia & Ors; Defendant / Appellant: International Hospitals Group Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) / Appeal Judgment on Security for Costs Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed; security for costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Impecuniosity, Conditional Fee Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kuenyehia & Ors
Claimant / Respondent
International Hospitals Group Limited
Defendant / Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) / Appeal Judgment on Security for Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a substantial order for security for costs would stifle the claim
- 2 Whether claimants provided credible evidence of impecuniosity
- 3 Appropriate quantum of security for costs
Ratio Decidendi
Claimants failed to provide credible or intelligible evidence of impecuniosity; they produced substantial sums when ordered; no factual basis for claim that security would stifle proceedings; court exercised discretion afresh and ordered security.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; security for costs ordered.
Orders
- Claimants to provide £100,000 security for costs by 25 March 2007.
- Further argument on method of payment to be heard after judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment