RBIL v Ryhurst & Ors [2011] EWHC 2209 (TCC) (08 August 2011)
The threshold for security for costs is met as the Claimant is unlikely to be able to pay the Defendants' costs if unsuccessful. The existence of a counterclaim does not preclude an order for security as the counterclaim would not have been pursued independently. The quantum of security is set at £1 million, reflecting a reduction for the lateness of the application and a reasonable allowance for likely taxation.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 2209 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: RBIL; Defendants: Ryhurst & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Security for Costs in Ongoing Commercial Litigation / Interlocutory Application Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Management Services Agreement, Counterclaim, Private Finance Initiative, Disclosure, Costs Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RBIL
Claimant
Ryhurst & Ors.
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs in Ongoing Commercial Litigation / Interlocutory Application Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered against the Claimant
- 2 Whether the existence of a counterclaim precludes an order for security for costs
- 3 Quantum of security for costs to be ordered
Ratio Decidendi
The threshold for security for costs is met as the Claimant is unlikely to be able to pay the Defendants' costs if unsuccessful. The existence of a counterclaim does not preclude an order for security as the counterclaim would not have been pursued independently. The quantum of security is set at £1 million, reflecting a reduction for the lateness of the application and a reasonable allowance for likely taxation.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Claimant to provide security for costs in the sum of £1 million.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment