Czech Republic v Diag Human SE & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 1518 (21 December 2023)

Czech Republic v Diag Human SE & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 1518 (21 December 2023)

The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to grant permission to appeal from a refusal to order security under section 70(7) Arbitration Act 1996, as such decisions are ancillary to challenges under sections 67 and 68 and only the first instance court can grant leave.

Citation
[2023] EWCA Civ 1518
Parties
Respondent/claimant: The Czech Republic; Appellant/defendant: Diag Human SE; Appellant/defendant: Josef Stava
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 December 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court Decision Refusing Security Under Section 70(7) Arbitration Act 1996
Outcome
Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Security for Arbitration Award, Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal, Section 70(7) Arbitration Act 1996, Challenge to Arbitral Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Czech Republic

Respondent/claimant

Diag Human SE

Appellant/defendant

Josef Stava

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court Decision Refusing Security Under Section 70(7) Arbitration Act 1996

  1. 1 Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to grant permission to appeal from a refusal to order security under section 70(7) Arbitration Act 1996?
  2. 2 Should security for the arbitration award be ordered under section 70(7)?
  3. 3 Is the alleged misconduct of the award debtor relevant to the exercise of discretion under section 70(7)?

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to grant permission to appeal from a refusal to order security under section 70(7) Arbitration Act 1996, as such decisions are ancillary to challenges under sections 67 and 68 and only the first instance court can grant leave.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.