K Ltd. v National Westminster Bank Plc & Anor
The application for security for costs is refused because the evidence does not fully satisfy the court that the appellant would be unable to pay costs, the application was made late, and the public interest in resolving the legal issues under the Proceeds of Crime Act outweighs the risk to the bank.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: K Limited; Defendant/respondent: National Westminster Bank PLC; Intervener: Customs and Excise
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Security for Costs on Appeal
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Impecuniosity, Proceeds of Crime Act, Bank Customer Relationship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K Limited
Claimant/appellant
National Westminster Bank PLC
Defendant/respondent
Customs and Excise
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Security for Costs on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered against the appellant under CPR 3.1(5) or CPR 25.15/25.13
- 2 Whether the appellant company is unable to pay the respondent’s costs if ordered to do so
- 3 Whether the timing and circumstances of the application justify the order
Ratio Decidendi
The application for security for costs is refused because the evidence does not fully satisfy the court that the appellant would be unable to pay costs, the application was made late, and the public interest in resolving the legal issues under the Proceeds of Crime Act outweighs the risk to the bank.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Application for security for costs is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment