Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd. v Associated British Ports [2011] EWHC 1790 (Ch) (27 June 2011)
The trial of the preliminary issue, as modified to reflect the current procedural posture and possible future reinstatement of competition law issues, should proceed in July 2011 to resolve the factual question of the landlord's intention under section 30(1)(g), as this will advance the litigation and provide certainty, with any further issues to be addressed after the Court of Appeal's decision.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 1790 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Limited; Respondent/defendant: Associated British Ports
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Pre Trial Review Under Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 / Pre Trial Review; Directions for Trial of Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Pre-trial review directions given; trial of modified preliminary issue to proceed in July 2011.
- Legal Topics
- Security of Tenure, New Tenancy Applications, Grounds for Opposition to New Tenancy, Abuse of Dominant Position, Interim Rent, Procedural Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Limited
Applicant/claimant
Associated British Ports
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Pre Trial Review Under Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 / Pre Trial Review; Directions for Trial of Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord intends to occupy the holding for the purposes of its business within the meaning of section 30(1)(g) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
- 2 Whether the landlord's reliance on section 30(1)(g) constitutes an abuse of dominant position under competition law
- 3 Whether the trial of the preliminary issue should proceed before the outcome of the Court of Appeal on the competition law pleadings
Ratio Decidendi
The trial of the preliminary issue, as modified to reflect the current procedural posture and possible future reinstatement of competition law issues, should proceed in July 2011 to resolve the factual question of the landlord's intention under section 30(1)(g), as this will advance the litigation and provide certainty, with any further issues to be addressed after the Court of Appeal's decision.
Court Disposition
Pre-trial review directions given; trial of modified preliminary issue to proceed in July 2011.
Orders
- Trial of the preliminary issue, as modified, to proceed in the July 2011 trial window.
- No adjournment pending the outcome of the Court of Appeal on competition law pleadings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment