Eccleston, R v [2001] EWCA Crim 1608 (10th July, 2001)
The original sentence of 18 months was unduly lenient given the seriousness of the offence, aggravating features, and established sentencing tariffs. Allowing for double jeopardy and distinguishing features, the appropriate sentence is 3 years and 6 months' imprisonment.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Crim 1608
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Offender: Everton Lorraine Eccleston
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Attorney General's Reference Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988; Sentence Review After Conviction and Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Sentence increased on Attorney General's Reference
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Wounding With Intent, Section 18 Offences Against the Person Act 1861, Attorney General's Reference, Double Jeopardy in Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Everton Lorraine Eccleston
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Attorney General's Reference Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988; Sentence Review After Conviction and Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original sentence of 18 months' imprisonment for wounding with intent was unduly lenient
- 2 Appropriate sentencing tariff for Section 18 wounding with intent after trial
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence of 18 months was unduly lenient given the seriousness of the offence, aggravating features, and established sentencing tariffs. Allowing for double jeopardy and distinguishing features, the appropriate sentence is 3 years and 6 months' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Sentence increased on Attorney General's Reference
Orders
- Original sentence of 18 months' imprisonment quashed
- Substituted sentence of 3 years and 6 months' imprisonment imposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment