Ali, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 870 (15 April 2025)
The original sentence of four years' detention was unduly lenient given the seriousness of the offence, the aggravating features, and the limited mitigation available. The appropriate sentence, after proper categorisation and discount for age and guilty plea, is 76 months' detention (six years and four months), with an adjusted disqualification period.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 870
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Offender: Adam Ali
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Attorney General's Reference (criminal) / Appeal Against Sentence Under Section 36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Dangerous Driving, Mitigation, Disqualification From Driving
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Adam Ali
Offender
Procedural Posture
Attorney General's Reference (criminal) / Appeal Against Sentence Under Section 36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original sentence for causing death by dangerous driving was unduly lenient
- 2 Appropriate categorisation of culpability under sentencing guidelines
- 3 Relevance of post-offence conduct to mitigation and sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence of four years' detention was unduly lenient given the seriousness of the offence, the aggravating features, and the limited mitigation available. The appropriate sentence, after proper categorisation and discount for age and guilty plea, is 76 months' detention (six years and four months), with an adjusted disqualification period.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Original sentence on count 1 quashed and replaced with 76 months' detention (six years and four months)
- Disqualification from driving on count 1 increased to eight years and two months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment